This topic is an endless source of ideas and arguments.
policy splits on this question incorrectly calling "ethics", as if the rights issue could be framed within the context of the behavior assessed on the basis of a moral argument.
The law does not ignore the behavior, but it certainly should be independent from any moral postulate, because the law should deal with those behaviors that concern the public sphere of citizens and should be preserved in any way that concerns the private sphere, subjective and personal individual citizens, within certain limits which are dictated by the terms of no harm to others.
The right to exist not so much expressing a behavior, when the awareness of being and have a guaranteed space in a society, especially if the company bears the word "democratic". But where is manifested in a democratic society if the condition of the minority is not even considered?
A society where the right to be denied to the minority because the majority feels threatened, it is not a democratic society.
0 comments:
Post a Comment